Austria vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Austria
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.6815 kg/ha against 0.6581 kg/ha in Austria, a difference of 0.0234 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7147 kg/ha | 0.6278 kg/ha | 0.087 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.6692 kg/ha | 0.7839 kg/ha | 0.1147 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.6842 kg/ha | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.0726 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.683 kg/ha | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.0006 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Austria or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.6815 kg/ha against 0.6581 kg/ha in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Austria and North Macedonia?
- 0.0234 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Austria ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).