Austria vs Peru: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Austria
- Peru
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.6581 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.0032 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 51st and Peru ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.46 kg/ha | 0.9137 kg/ha | 0.5501 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1970s | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.62 kg/ha | 0.4676 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1980s | 0.8743 kg/ha | 0.4982 kg/ha | 0.3761 kg/ha | Austria |
| 1990s | 0.7421 kg/ha | 0.4905 kg/ha | 0.2517 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.6692 kg/ha | 0.7842 kg/ha | 0.115 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.6842 kg/ha | 0.7177 kg/ha | 0.0335 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.683 kg/ha | 0.6823 kg/ha | 0.0008 kg/ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Austria or Peru?
- Austria, at 0.6581 kg/ha against 0.6549 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Austria and Peru?
- 0.0032 kg/ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Austria ranks 51st and Peru ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).