Azerbaijan vs China, mainland: Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- China, mainland
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.9222 kg/ha against 0.8974 kg/ha in China, mainland, a difference of 0.0248 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China, mainland ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 19th and China, mainland ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and China, mainland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | China, mainland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4843 kg/ha | 0.9079 kg/ha | 0.4236 kg/ha | China, mainland |
| 2000s | 0.9774 kg/ha | 0.8737 kg/ha | 0.1037 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.8371 kg/ha | 0.1971 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.961 kg/ha | 0.9002 kg/ha | 0.0608 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or China, mainland?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.9222 kg/ha against 0.8974 kg/ha in China, mainland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and China, mainland?
- 0.0248 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China, mainland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and China, mainland rank globally for seed β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 19th and China, mainland ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).