Azerbaijan vs Côte d'Ivoire: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.9222 kg/ha against 0.4536 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.4686 kg/ha.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 2.0 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Côte d'Ivoire in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4843 kg/ha | 0.5164 kg/ha | 0.0321 kg/ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 0.9774 kg/ha | 0.5898 kg/ha | 0.3875 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.5141 kg/ha | 0.5201 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.961 kg/ha | 0.4728 kg/ha | 0.4882 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.9222 kg/ha against 0.4536 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0.4686 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).