Azerbaijan vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.984 kg/ha against 0.9222 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.0618 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4843 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.9774 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | 0.6288 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.9847 kg/ha | 0.0495 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.961 kg/ha | 0.9125 kg/ha | 0.0484 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.984 kg/ha against 0.9222 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 0.0618 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 19th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).