Belarus vs Central Asia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Central Asia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.48 kg/ha against 0.6562 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 0.8238 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.3 times Central Asia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 6th and Central Asia ranks 9th of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.93 kg/ha | 0.5329 kg/ha | 2.39 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.566 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2.03 kg/ha | 0.6954 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.46 kg/ha | 0.6688 kg/ha | 0.7955 kg/ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Central Asia?
- Belarus, at 1.48 kg/ha against 0.6562 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Central Asia?
- 0.8238 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Central Asia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Central Asia ranks 9th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).