Belarus vs Egypt: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1.75 kg/ha against 1.48 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Egypt ranks 3rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Egypt in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.93 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 2.29 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 0.9815 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2.03 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | 0.4379 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.46 kg/ha | 1.86 kg/ha | 0.3915 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 1.75 kg/ha against 1.48 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Egypt?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Egypt?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Egypt rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Egypt ranks 3rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).