Belarus vs Western Europe: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Western Europe
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.48 kg/ha against 0.6621 kg/ha in Western Europe, a difference of 0.8179 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.2 times Western Europe's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 6th and Western Europe ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Western Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.93 kg/ha | 0.6609 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.6174 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2.03 kg/ha | 0.588 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.46 kg/ha | 0.649 kg/ha | 0.8154 kg/ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Western Europe?
- Belarus, at 1.48 kg/ha against 0.6621 kg/ha in Western Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Western Europe?
- 0.8179 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Western Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Western Europe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Western Europe ranks 2nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).