Belgium-Luxembourg vs Paraguay: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.8831 kg/ha against 0.8712 kg/ha in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0119 kg/ha.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 29th and Paraguay ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.06 kg/ha | 0.1842 kg/ha | 0.8761 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 0.7455 kg/ha | 0.373 kg/ha | 0.3725 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 0.8064 kg/ha | 0.5241 kg/ha | 0.2823 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.8215 kg/ha | 0.4465 kg/ha | 0.375 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.8831 kg/ha against 0.8712 kg/ha in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Paraguay?
- 0.0119 kg/ha, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Paraguay?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Paraguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 29th and Paraguay ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).