Belgium-Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Rwanda
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0.8712 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0274 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.06 kg/ha | 0.9742 kg/ha | 0.086 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 0.7455 kg/ha | 0.8202 kg/ha | 0.0747 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.8064 kg/ha | 0.7491 kg/ha | 0.0573 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.8215 kg/ha | 0.7127 kg/ha | 0.1088 kg/ha | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Rwanda?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0.8712 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 1999.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 0.0274 kg/ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).