Belize vs Eritrea: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belize
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0971 kg/ha against 0.0913 kg/ha in Belize, a difference of 0.0058 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Belize ranks 159th and Eritrea ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0057 kg/ha | 0.1938 kg/ha | 0.1881 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0075 kg/ha | 0.1067 kg/ha | 0.0993 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.1312 kg/ha | 0.0967 kg/ha | 0.0344 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2020s | 0.0774 kg/ha | 0.0966 kg/ha | 0.0193 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Belize or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.0971 kg/ha against 0.0913 kg/ha in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Belize and Eritrea?
- 0.0058 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Eritrea rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belize ranks 159th and Eritrea ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).