Benin vs Lebanon: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Benin
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.6115 kg/ha against 0.5973 kg/ha in Benin, a difference of 0.0142 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 59th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 6 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6958 kg/ha | 0.3562 kg/ha | 0.3396 kg/ha | Benin |
| 1970s | 0.5072 kg/ha | 0.2728 kg/ha | 0.2344 kg/ha | Benin |
| 1980s | 0.6397 kg/ha | 0.3047 kg/ha | 0.3349 kg/ha | Benin |
| 1990s | 0.8643 kg/ha | 0.3904 kg/ha | 0.4739 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2000s | 0.8131 kg/ha | 0.5365 kg/ha | 0.2766 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2010s | 0.7283 kg/ha | 0.4915 kg/ha | 0.2368 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2020s | 0.6069 kg/ha | 0.6249 kg/ha | 0.0181 kg/ha | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Benin or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 0.6115 kg/ha against 0.5973 kg/ha in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Benin and Lebanon?
- 0.0142 kg/ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Lebanon rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Benin ranks 59th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).