Benin vs Suriname: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Benin
- Suriname
How they compare
Benin currently reports 0.5973 kg/ha against 0.5905 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 0.0068 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Benin ranks 59th and Suriname ranks 60th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6958 kg/ha | 0.8213 kg/ha | 0.1255 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.5072 kg/ha | 0.8119 kg/ha | 0.3047 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.6397 kg/ha | 0.6713 kg/ha | 0.0316 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.8643 kg/ha | 0.5274 kg/ha | 0.3368 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2000s | 0.8131 kg/ha | 0.5779 kg/ha | 0.2352 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2010s | 0.7283 kg/ha | 0.5394 kg/ha | 0.1889 kg/ha | Benin |
| 2020s | 0.6069 kg/ha | 0.5834 kg/ha | 0.0235 kg/ha | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Benin or Suriname?
- Benin, at 0.5973 kg/ha against 0.5905 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Benin and Suriname?
- 0.0068 kg/ha, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Suriname rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Benin ranks 59th and Suriname ranks 60th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).