Bhutan vs Eswatini: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.176 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0093 kg/ha.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2603 kg/ha | 0.1048 kg/ha | 0.1555 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 0.2253 kg/ha | 0.1257 kg/ha | 0.0997 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 0.1877 kg/ha | 0.1845 kg/ha | 0.0032 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 0.1825 kg/ha | 0.1797 kg/ha | 0.0028 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.1891 kg/ha | 0.1057 kg/ha | 0.0834 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.2745 kg/ha | 0.1502 kg/ha | 0.1243 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.1986 kg/ha | 0.1716 kg/ha | 0.0269 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Bhutan or Eswatini?
- Bhutan, at 0.176 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 0.0093 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Eswatini rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).