Bhutan vs Mali: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Mali
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.176 kg/ha against 0.1689 kg/ha in Mali, a difference of 0.0071 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Bhutan ranks 133rd and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Mali in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2603 kg/ha | 0.2598 kg/ha | 0.0005 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 0.2253 kg/ha | 0.2893 kg/ha | 0.0639 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.1877 kg/ha | 0.354 kg/ha | 0.1663 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.1825 kg/ha | 0.4254 kg/ha | 0.243 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.1891 kg/ha | 0.333 kg/ha | 0.1439 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.2745 kg/ha | 0.2017 kg/ha | 0.0728 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.1986 kg/ha | 0.1705 kg/ha | 0.028 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Bhutan or Mali?
- Bhutan, at 0.176 kg/ha against 0.1689 kg/ha in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Bhutan and Mali?
- 0.0071 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Mali rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 133rd and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).