Botswana vs Ethiopia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0.2288 kg/ha against 0.2282 kg/ha in Botswana, a difference of 0.0006 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Botswana ranks 118th and Ethiopia ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1137 kg/ha | 0.2456 kg/ha | 0.132 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0.0991 kg/ha | 0.2635 kg/ha | 0.1645 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.101 kg/ha | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.111 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 0.3344 kg/ha | 0.2233 kg/ha | 0.1111 kg/ha | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Botswana or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 0.2288 kg/ha against 0.2282 kg/ha in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Botswana and Ethiopia?
- 0.0006 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Ethiopia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 118th and Ethiopia ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).