Brazil vs Denmark: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Denmark
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.7951 kg/ha against 0.7632 kg/ha in Denmark, a difference of 0.0319 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Brazil ranks 39th and Denmark ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3778 kg/ha | 0.8087 kg/ha | 0.4308 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 1970s | 0.4352 kg/ha | 0.8504 kg/ha | 0.4153 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 1980s | 0.3551 kg/ha | 0.8905 kg/ha | 0.5354 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 1990s | 0.3487 kg/ha | 0.9334 kg/ha | 0.5848 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.401 kg/ha | 0.8895 kg/ha | 0.4885 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.5304 kg/ha | 0.8337 kg/ha | 0.3033 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.7081 kg/ha | 0.7646 kg/ha | 0.0566 kg/ha | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Brazil or Denmark?
- Brazil, at 0.7951 kg/ha against 0.7632 kg/ha in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Brazil and Denmark?
- 0.0319 kg/ha, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Denmark?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Denmark rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 39th and Denmark ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).