Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area

Burundi
0.8977 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.3594 kg/ha
in 2023
Burundi rank
20th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
22nd

Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Burundi
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.8977 kg/ha against 0.3594 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0.5383 kg/ha.

That makes Burundi's figure about 2.5 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 22nd of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 6 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4141 kg/ha 0.3112 kg/ha 0.1029 kg/ha Burundi
1970s 0.3816 kg/ha 0.3202 kg/ha 0.0613 kg/ha Burundi
1980s 0.3828 kg/ha 0.3236 kg/ha 0.0593 kg/ha Burundi
1990s 0.3846 kg/ha 0.3284 kg/ha 0.0562 kg/ha Burundi
2000s 0.2775 kg/ha 0.3509 kg/ha 0.0735 kg/ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 0.3918 kg/ha 0.3393 kg/ha 0.0524 kg/ha Burundi
2020s 0.9064 kg/ha 0.3542 kg/ha 0.5522 kg/ha Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Burundi or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Burundi, at 0.8977 kg/ha against 0.3594 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
0.5383 kg/ha, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
Burundi ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/burundi/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/burundi/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).