Burundi vs Poland: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Poland
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.8977 kg/ha against 0.8975 kg/ha in Poland, a difference of 0.0002 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Burundi ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4141 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1970s | 0.3816 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1980s | 0.3828 kg/ha | 2.54 kg/ha | 2.16 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1990s | 0.3846 kg/ha | 2.03 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.2775 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.3918 kg/ha | 1.18 kg/ha | 0.7919 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.9064 kg/ha | 0.9523 kg/ha | 0.0459 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Burundi or Poland?
- Burundi, at 0.8977 kg/ha against 0.8975 kg/ha in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Burundi and Poland?
- 0.0002 kg/ha, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Poland rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).