Cabo Verde vs Turkmenistan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cabo Verde
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 1.11 kg/ha against 0.4884 kg/ha in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.6216 kg/ha.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 2.3 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 14th of 29 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7673 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.3819 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0.5218 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | 0.496 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0.5837 kg/ha | 0.9002 kg/ha | 0.3165 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 0.4884 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | 0.5354 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cabo Verde or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 1.11 kg/ha against 0.4884 kg/ha in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan?
- 0.6216 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Turkmenistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cabo Verde ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 14th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).