Cambodia vs Montenegro: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.3974 kg/ha against 0.3814 kg/ha in Cambodia, a difference of 0.016 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Cambodia ranks 91st and Montenegro ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4023 kg/ha | 0.8294 kg/ha | 0.4271 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.4018 kg/ha | 0.1155 kg/ha | 0.2863 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.3795 kg/ha | 0.5934 kg/ha | 0.2139 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cambodia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.3974 kg/ha against 0.3814 kg/ha in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 0.016 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Montenegro rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 91st and Montenegro ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).