Canada vs Kazakhstan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Canada
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4379 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.0294 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Canada ranks 71st and Kazakhstan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3348 kg/ha | 0.4576 kg/ha | 0.1227 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.3989 kg/ha | 0.4589 kg/ha | 0.06 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.4208 kg/ha | 0.5134 kg/ha | 0.0926 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.4405 kg/ha | 0.4853 kg/ha | 0.0448 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Canada or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4379 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Canada and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0294 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Kazakhstan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Canada ranks 71st and Kazakhstan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).