Caribbean vs Chad: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Caribbean
- Chad
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 0.1734 kg/ha against 0.1704 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.003 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Caribbean ranks 134th and Chad ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1448 kg/ha | 0.2991 kg/ha | 0.1544 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.1187 kg/ha | 0.2719 kg/ha | 0.1532 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.1166 kg/ha | 0.1791 kg/ha | 0.0625 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.1083 kg/ha | 0.2691 kg/ha | 0.1607 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.1117 kg/ha | 0.2909 kg/ha | 0.1792 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.1828 kg/ha | 0.019 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.1754 kg/ha | 0.1703 kg/ha | 0.0051 kg/ha | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Caribbean or Chad?
- Caribbean, at 0.1734 kg/ha against 0.1704 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Caribbean and Chad?
- 0.003 kg/ha, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Chad rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Caribbean ranks 134th and Chad ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).