Caribbean vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Caribbean
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.1734 kg/ha in Caribbean, a difference of 0.7005 kg/ha.
That makes Latvia's figure about 5.0 times Caribbean's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1069 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.1117 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1638 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.9832 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.1754 kg/ha | 0.9173 kg/ha | 0.7419 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Caribbean or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.1734 kg/ha in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Caribbean and Latvia?
- 0.7005 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Caribbean ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).