Central America vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Central America
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Central America, a difference of 0.7072 kg/ha.
That makes Latvia's figure about 5.2 times Central America's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 30th of 32 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1969 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 1.63 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.1821 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | 1.26 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1892 kg/ha | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.9577 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.1836 kg/ha | 0.9173 kg/ha | 0.7337 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Central America or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Central America and Latvia?
- 0.7072 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Central America ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 30th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).