Central Asia vs Kyrgyzstan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Central Asia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.4 kg/ha against 0.6562 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 0.7438 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 2.1 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 29 groups.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5329 kg/ha | 0.7901 kg/ha | 0.2572 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.566 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.8637 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.6954 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.7885 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.6688 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | 0.8214 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Central Asia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.4 kg/ha against 0.6562 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Central Asia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7438 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Central Asia ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).