Chad vs Eswatini: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chad
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.1704 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0037 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2991 kg/ha | 0.1048 kg/ha | 0.1943 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.2719 kg/ha | 0.1257 kg/ha | 0.1462 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.1791 kg/ha | 0.1845 kg/ha | 0.0054 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.2691 kg/ha | 0.1797 kg/ha | 0.0894 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.2909 kg/ha | 0.1057 kg/ha | 0.1852 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.1828 kg/ha | 0.1502 kg/ha | 0.0326 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.1703 kg/ha | 0.1716 kg/ha | 0.0013 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Chad or Eswatini?
- Chad, at 0.1704 kg/ha against 0.1667 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Chad and Eswatini?
- 0.0037 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Eswatini rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chad ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).