Chad vs Mali: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chad
- Mali
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.1704 kg/ha against 0.1689 kg/ha in Mali, a difference of 0.0015 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 135th and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2991 kg/ha | 0.2598 kg/ha | 0.0393 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.2719 kg/ha | 0.2893 kg/ha | 0.0174 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.1791 kg/ha | 0.354 kg/ha | 0.1749 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.2691 kg/ha | 0.4254 kg/ha | 0.1564 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.2909 kg/ha | 0.333 kg/ha | 0.042 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.1828 kg/ha | 0.2017 kg/ha | 0.0189 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.1703 kg/ha | 0.1705 kg/ha | 0.0002 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Chad or Mali?
- Chad, at 0.1704 kg/ha against 0.1689 kg/ha in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Chad and Mali?
- 0.0015 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Mali rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chad ranks 135th and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).