Chile vs Ethiopia PDR: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 0.2034 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.008 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 127th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3985 kg/ha | 0.2003 kg/ha | 0.1981 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1970s | 0.3616 kg/ha | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.1839 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.359 kg/ha | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.1642 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.3947 kg/ha | 0.2103 kg/ha | 0.1845 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 0.2034 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.008 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chile and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 127th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).