Chile vs Honduras: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 0.2028 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.0074 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 127th and Honduras ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3985 kg/ha | 0.0823 kg/ha | 0.3162 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1970s | 0.3616 kg/ha | 0.0977 kg/ha | 0.2638 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.359 kg/ha | 0.1348 kg/ha | 0.2242 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.423 kg/ha | 0.1496 kg/ha | 0.2734 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.4805 kg/ha | 0.2477 kg/ha | 0.2328 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.3554 kg/ha | 0.2059 kg/ha | 0.1494 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.2288 kg/ha | 0.1985 kg/ha | 0.0304 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 0.2028 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Honduras?
- 0.0074 kg/ha, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Honduras rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 127th and Honduras ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).