Chile vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.204 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.0086 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3985 kg/ha | 0.2809 kg/ha | 0.1176 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1970s | 0.3616 kg/ha | 0.2604 kg/ha | 0.1012 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.359 kg/ha | 0.1586 kg/ha | 0.2004 kg/ha | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.423 kg/ha | 0.2068 kg/ha | 0.2162 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.4805 kg/ha | 0.2199 kg/ha | 0.2605 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.3554 kg/ha | 0.1731 kg/ha | 0.1822 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.2288 kg/ha | 0.2348 kg/ha | 0.006 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.204 kg/ha against 0.1954 kg/ha in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Uganda?
- 0.0086 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).