Colombia vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Colombia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.8545 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0107 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Colombia ranks 32nd and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3858 kg/ha | 0.9742 kg/ha | 0.5884 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.5024 kg/ha | 0.8202 kg/ha | 0.3178 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.5723 kg/ha | 0.7491 kg/ha | 0.1768 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.7445 kg/ha | 0.7127 kg/ha | 0.0318 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2000s | 0.8957 kg/ha | 0.9211 kg/ha | 0.0253 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.7124 kg/ha | 0.4044 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0.8888 kg/ha | 0.8111 kg/ha | 0.0777 kg/ha | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Colombia or Rwanda?
- Colombia, at 0.8545 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Colombia and Rwanda?
- 0.0107 kg/ha, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Colombia ranks 32nd and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).