Comoros vs Jordan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Comoros
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.2342 kg/ha against 0.233 kg/ha in Comoros, a difference of 0.0012 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Comoros ranks 115th and Jordan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2764 kg/ha | 0.6699 kg/ha | 0.3935 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.2732 kg/ha | 0.4443 kg/ha | 0.1712 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.2412 kg/ha | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.0717 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.2096 kg/ha | 0.5409 kg/ha | 0.3313 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.1892 kg/ha | 0.4436 kg/ha | 0.2544 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.1904 kg/ha | 0.3949 kg/ha | 0.2045 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.2323 kg/ha | 0.2744 kg/ha | 0.0421 kg/ha | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Comoros or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.2342 kg/ha against 0.233 kg/ha in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Comoros and Jordan?
- 0.0012 kg/ha, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Jordan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Comoros ranks 115th and Jordan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).