Congo vs Fiji: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Congo
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0.0857 kg/ha against 0.0721 kg/ha in Congo, a difference of 0.0136 kg/ha.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Fiji in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0595 kg/ha | 0.057 kg/ha | 0.0026 kg/ha | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.0543 kg/ha | 0.0552 kg/ha | 0.0009 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0.0546 kg/ha | 0.0441 kg/ha | 0.0105 kg/ha | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.0595 kg/ha | 0.031 kg/ha | 0.0285 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0764 kg/ha | 0.0347 kg/ha | 0.0417 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0743 kg/ha | 0.0708 kg/ha | 0.0035 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0761 kg/ha | 0.0911 kg/ha | 0.015 kg/ha | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Congo or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 0.0857 kg/ha against 0.0721 kg/ha in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Congo and Fiji?
- 0.0136 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Fiji?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Fiji rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Congo ranks 163rd and Fiji ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).