Costa Rica vs Kazakhstan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4334 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0339 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 72nd and Kazakhstan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3772 kg/ha | 0.4576 kg/ha | 0.0804 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.365 kg/ha | 0.4589 kg/ha | 0.0939 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.3161 kg/ha | 0.5134 kg/ha | 0.1973 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.6291 kg/ha | 0.4853 kg/ha | 0.1438 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4334 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0339 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Kazakhstan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 72nd and Kazakhstan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).