Côte d'Ivoire vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.984 kg/ha against 0.4536 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.5304 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.2 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 29 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5164 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.5898 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.5141 kg/ha | 0.9847 kg/ha | 0.4706 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.4728 kg/ha | 0.9125 kg/ha | 0.4397 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Côte d'Ivoire or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.984 kg/ha against 0.4536 kg/ha in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania?
- 0.5304 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).