Croatia vs Estonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6463 kg/ha in Croatia, a difference of 0.0083 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Croatia ranks 55th and Estonia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7801 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.4131 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.6741 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | 0.3325 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.44 kg/ha | 0.7126 kg/ha | 0.2726 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.5906 kg/ha | 0.6867 kg/ha | 0.0961 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Croatia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6463 kg/ha in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Croatia and Estonia?
- 0.0083 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Croatia ranks 55th and Estonia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).