Cuba vs Lesotho: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.1387 kg/ha against 0.1353 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.0034 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Lesotho ranks 144th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1915 kg/ha | 0.1753 kg/ha | 0.0162 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.1129 kg/ha | 0.1465 kg/ha | 0.0335 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 0.1091 kg/ha | 0.1217 kg/ha | 0.0126 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 0.1053 kg/ha | 0.0762 kg/ha | 0.0291 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1019 kg/ha | 0.0953 kg/ha | 0.0067 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.1282 kg/ha | 0.0859 kg/ha | 0.0423 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.1353 kg/ha | 0.1504 kg/ha | 0.0151 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0.1387 kg/ha against 0.1353 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Lesotho?
- 0.0034 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Lesotho rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Lesotho ranks 144th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).