Cuba vs Yemen: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Yemen
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.1353 kg/ha against 0.131 kg/ha in Yemen, a difference of 0.0043 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Yemen ranks 146th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1915 kg/ha | 0.1733 kg/ha | 0.0182 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.1129 kg/ha | 0.1661 kg/ha | 0.0532 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1980s | 0.1091 kg/ha | 0.1549 kg/ha | 0.0458 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1990s | 0.1053 kg/ha | 0.1412 kg/ha | 0.0359 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2000s | 0.1019 kg/ha | 0.1726 kg/ha | 0.0707 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2010s | 0.1282 kg/ha | 0.1716 kg/ha | 0.0434 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2020s | 0.1353 kg/ha | 0.1322 kg/ha | 0.0031 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Yemen?
- Cuba, at 0.1353 kg/ha against 0.131 kg/ha in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Yemen?
- 0.0043 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Yemen rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Yemen ranks 146th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).