Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1435 kg/ha against 0.1353 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.0082 kg/ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Cuba ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1915 kg/ha | 0.3731 kg/ha | 0.1816 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.1129 kg/ha | 0.3323 kg/ha | 0.2194 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.1091 kg/ha | 0.2827 kg/ha | 0.1736 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1053 kg/ha | 0.242 kg/ha | 0.1367 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1019 kg/ha | 0.2132 kg/ha | 0.1113 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1282 kg/ha | 0.1288 kg/ha | 0.0006 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1353 kg/ha | 0.1469 kg/ha | 0.0116 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.1435 kg/ha against 0.1353 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0082 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).