Cyprus vs Lebanon: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.6115 kg/ha against 0.602 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 0.0095 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 58th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4872 kg/ha | 0.3562 kg/ha | 0.131 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 0.7251 kg/ha | 0.2728 kg/ha | 0.4523 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 0.9309 kg/ha | 0.3047 kg/ha | 0.6262 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.3904 kg/ha | 0.7323 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 0.9744 kg/ha | 0.5365 kg/ha | 0.4379 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 0.73 kg/ha | 0.4915 kg/ha | 0.2385 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0.7111 kg/ha | 0.6249 kg/ha | 0.0862 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Cyprus or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 0.6115 kg/ha against 0.602 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Cyprus and Lebanon?
- 0.0095 kg/ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Lebanon rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 58th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).