Czechia vs Finland: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.758 kg/ha against 0.7246 kg/ha in Finland, a difference of 0.0334 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 44th and Finland ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9812 kg/ha | 0.7791 kg/ha | 0.2022 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.9184 kg/ha | 0.8329 kg/ha | 0.0855 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.8768 kg/ha | 0.7485 kg/ha | 0.1284 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.8151 kg/ha | 0.7507 kg/ha | 0.0645 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 0.758 kg/ha against 0.7246 kg/ha in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Finland?
- 0.0334 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 44th and Finland ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).