Czechia vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.758 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0765 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 41st and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9812 kg/ha | 0.6335 kg/ha | 0.3477 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.9184 kg/ha | 0.7839 kg/ha | 0.1346 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.8768 kg/ha | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.12 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.8151 kg/ha | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.1315 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or North Macedonia?
- Czechia, at 0.758 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0765 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and North Macedonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 41st and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).