Czechia vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.7871 kg/ha against 0.758 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.0291 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Czechia ranks 41st and Russian Federation ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9812 kg/ha | 0.9636 kg/ha | 0.0177 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.9184 kg/ha | 0.8578 kg/ha | 0.0606 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.8768 kg/ha | 0.8811 kg/ha | 0.0043 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 0.8151 kg/ha | 0.7855 kg/ha | 0.0296 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.7871 kg/ha against 0.758 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Russian Federation?
- 0.0291 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Russian Federation?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Russian Federation rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 41st and Russian Federation ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).