Czechoslovakia vs Israel: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Israel
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 0.5361 kg/ha against 0.4917 kg/ha in Israel, a difference of 0.0444 kg/ha.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Israel ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.57 kg/ha | 0.4816 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.5036 kg/ha | 0.5758 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 0.7301 kg/ha | 0.4739 kg/ha | 0.2563 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 0.5212 kg/ha | 0.3565 kg/ha | 0.1647 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Israel?
- Czechoslovakia, at 0.5361 kg/ha against 0.4917 kg/ha in Israel as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Israel?
- 0.0444 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Israel?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Israel rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Israel ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).