Czechoslovakia vs Mozambique: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.5431 kg/ha against 0.5361 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.007 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.57 kg/ha | 0.3252 kg/ha | 1.25 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.2808 kg/ha | 0.7986 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 0.7301 kg/ha | 0.2574 kg/ha | 0.4728 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 0.5212 kg/ha | 0.2317 kg/ha | 0.2895 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.5431 kg/ha against 0.5361 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Mozambique?
- 0.007 kg/ha, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Mozambique?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Mozambique rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).