Czechoslovakia vs Türkiye: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 0.5609 kg/ha against 0.5361 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.0248 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Türkiye ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.57 kg/ha | 0.5405 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.5652 kg/ha | 0.5142 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 0.7301 kg/ha | 0.6204 kg/ha | 0.1098 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 0.5212 kg/ha | 0.6648 kg/ha | 0.1436 kg/ha | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 0.5609 kg/ha against 0.5361 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Türkiye?
- 0.0248 kg/ha, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Türkiye?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Türkiye rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 67th and Türkiye ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).