Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.1786 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2646 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.2646 kg/ha against 0.1786 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.086 kg/ha.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.5 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2664 kg/ha 0.1995 kg/ha 0.0669 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 0.2529 kg/ha 0.2034 kg/ha 0.0495 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 0.2423 kg/ha 0.2052 kg/ha 0.0371 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 0.2425 kg/ha 0.2118 kg/ha 0.0307 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 0.2484 kg/ha 0.2497 kg/ha 0.0013 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.1686 kg/ha 0.3226 kg/ha 0.154 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.1784 kg/ha 0.2745 kg/ha 0.0961 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.2646 kg/ha against 0.1786 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.086 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).