Dominica vs Georgia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Georgia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0.8437 kg/ha against 0.8231 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.0206 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4321 kg/ha | 0.5796 kg/ha | 0.1475 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.6732 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.3957 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.7949 kg/ha | 0.0488 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.7924 kg/ha | 0.0513 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominica or Georgia?
- Dominica, at 0.8437 kg/ha against 0.8231 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominica and Georgia?
- 0.0206 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Georgia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).