Dominica vs India: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominica
- India
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0.8437 kg/ha against 0.819 kg/ha in India, a difference of 0.0247 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 34th and India ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 3 and India in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3557 kg/ha | 0.3585 kg/ha | 0.0028 kg/ha | India |
| 1970s | 0.3412 kg/ha | 0.4248 kg/ha | 0.0836 kg/ha | India |
| 1980s | 0.3817 kg/ha | 0.5029 kg/ha | 0.1212 kg/ha | India |
| 1990s | 0.4182 kg/ha | 0.5323 kg/ha | 0.1142 kg/ha | India |
| 2000s | 0.6732 kg/ha | 0.5867 kg/ha | 0.0865 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.6815 kg/ha | 0.1622 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.7524 kg/ha | 0.0913 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominica or India?
- Dominica, at 0.8437 kg/ha against 0.819 kg/ha in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominica and India?
- 0.0247 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and India rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 34th and India ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).